3-[2-(2-Aminoethylamino)ethylamino]propyl-trimethoxysilane emerged from decades of chemical research focused on bridging inorganic and organic surfaces. Back in the 1940s, chemists hunting for ways to bond glass fibers to organic resins turned to organosilane molecules. These compounds offer unique versatility: the silicon atom forms bonds with silica surfaces, while organic side chains attach to a range of polymers. Through the latter half of the 20th century, researchers added functional groups to silanes to suit demanding applications in adhesives, composites, and coatings. Triaminosilane derivatives stand out due to their multiple amine groups, which allow for strong adhesion and crosslinking, boosting performance in electronic potting compounds and hybrid materials. Every improvement stemmed from an ongoing push for durable, long-lasting materials in construction, electronics, and automotive sectors, especially as equipment reliability became an economic necessity.
3-[2-(2-Aminoethylamino)ethylamino]propyl-trimethoxysilane, commercially known as N-(3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl)diethylenetriamine or DETA silane, belongs to the multifunctional organosilane family. This molecule features a trimethoxysilane group ready to react with glass, metal oxides, and ceramics, connected via a flexible propyl chain to a diethylenetriamine tail. The result: a highly effective molecular bridge that binds inorganic fillers with organic polymers by forming covalent bonds. As a liquid at room temperature, it dissolves readily in alcohols or ketones, streamlining its use in many processing environments. Users typically value its clear appearance and stability—good for transparent coatings and demanding adhesive systems. The balance between reactivity and handling makes DETA silane a staple for manufacturers searching for increased bonding strength and chemical resistance in their products.
DETA silane presents itself as a colorless or slightly yellowish liquid with a mild amino odor. Boiling point hovers around 285°C, enabling use in high-temperature processes without significant vapor loss. Its density sits near 1.04 g/cm³ at 25°C, providing easy measurement and blending. The molecule’s trimethoxysilyl group hydrolyzes swiftly in water, kicking off silanol formation, which is crucial to its surface bonding ability. Multiple amine groups generate positive charges, enhancing compatibility with acidic resins and coupling performance with certain fillers. Main analytical data points—like assay by GC and NMR—guarantee batch consistency, an absolute necessity in industrial and research settings. The molecule remains stable under dry, ambient conditions but reacts quickly once exposed to moisture, so proper handling and storage matter for safety and performance.
In packaging and distribution, technical data sheets for DETA silane lay out purity, usually above 97% by gas chromatography, and note water content below 0.5%. Standard containers range from 1-liter amber bottles for laboratory work to 200-liter drums for industrial applications. Labeling complies with GHS, highlighting precautionary statements: eye and skin irritant, harmful if inhaled, and water-reactive. Material safety data highlight flash point, typically about 107°C, plus UN codes for shipping. Handling instructions include use of chemical goggles, gloves, and operation in ventilated areas. Regulatory listings under TSCA (US), REACH (EU), and similar frameworks reassure users on global trade and legal compliance, so researchers and engineers alike know the product stands up to scrutiny from regulators and customers.
I’ve seen suppliers rely on direct synthetic routes using 3-chloropropyltrimethoxysilane and diethylenetriamine under controlled conditions. This reaction requires careful temperature control and efficient mixing, since exothermicity and byproduct hydrochloric acid can reduce yield or complicate purification. Best practice involves slow addition of the silane to an excess of the amine under nitrogen, followed by neutralization and distillation to isolate the product. Technicians measure the residual amine, silicate content, and trace metals to ensure tight quality control. Downstream, the silane undergoes filtration to remove particulates, and analytic checks confirm it meets electronics-grade or industrial-grade standards. Reliable production means downstream users can trust the silane’s performance batch to batch, reducing troubleshooting time and manufacturing waste.
DETA silane acts as both a coupling agent and a reactive intermediate. In practical use, the trimethoxysilane moiety hydrolyzes in humid air or in the presence of a catalyst, sprouting multiple silanol (-Si–OH) groups that form strong –Si–O–Si– crosslinks with inorganic materials. The amine-rich side reacts with epoxy, isocyanate, or carboxylic acid groups in resins, forming tough, chemical-resistant covalent bonds. Chemists manipulate this scaffold further: capping the terminal amine to reduce reactivity in sensitive applications or grafting other functional groups when targeting compatibilization with unusual polymers. This flexibility changes surface energy, alters wetting behavior, and fine-tunes final composite properties. Having experience with materials modification, it’s clear that choosing the right silane saves hours (or even days) of troubleshooting in lab-to-pilot scale translation.
This silane pops up under alternate names based on supplier or chemical context, such as DETA Silane, N-(3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl)diethylenetriamine, and Silquest A-1120. These synonyms help engineers and procurement specialists source the exact compound for industrial formulas or experimental protocols. CAS number 1760-24-3 anchors regulatory searches, while names like TMS-DETA or 3-(2-Aminoethylamino)propyltrimethoxysilane circle through patents and supplier literature. Understanding these terms cuts down confusion, safeguards project timelines, and reduces costly order mistakes.
Handling DETA silane demands attention and respect due to its amine groups and reactive alkoxysilane functionality. Skin contact can cause irritation or burns, especially on repeated exposure. Inhalation of vapors triggers respiratory discomfort, so good industrial hygiene means fume hoods or local extraction during weighing, mixing, and application. Chemical-resistant gloves and goggles form a basic line of defense. Liquid spills hydrolyze rapidly, making surfaces slippery and hazardous. Emergency responders rely on up-to-date safety data sheets, while industrial operations maintain spill containment and emergency wash stations. Storage in tightly sealed containers, away from moisture and acids, preserves shelf life. Routine employee training and adherence to OSHA, REACH or similar guidelines keep incident numbers low and product losses minimal. From my work in laboratory training, engaging safety specialists early prevents years of headaches.
DETA silane serves several industries that rely on strong chemical bonds between very different materials. In the automotive and aerospace sectors, its coupling power boosts strength and impact resistance in glass-fiber composites used for lightweight body panels. Electronics manufacturing depends on it to encapsulate delicate circuit boards, fighting humidity and corrosion over long product lifetimes. Adhesive formulators prize the diamine moiety for forming stable, flexible bonds between metals and plastic substrates, crucial for modern lightweight assemblies. Paints and coatings benefit from improved adhesion to glass, metals, and ceramics, plus crosslinking that slows down environmental degradation. And as environmental rules tighten, waterproofing and corrosion-resistant sealants increasingly bring this molecule into their new formulations. My conversations with formulators reflect a consistent message: adding the right silane often makes the difference between field success and expensive callbacks.
University and corporate researchers dig deep into the molecular mechanics of silane coupling every year. Many investigate the dynamics of hydrolysis and condensation, striving for better control over application window and bond density. Scholars use atomic force microscopy and spectroscopy to map how silanes order themselves on glass fibers. Some teams target novel modifications—say, grafting in a polymerizable handle or a UV-activated group—for next-generation adhesives or biomedical materials. Cross-disciplinary work linking polymer science, surface chemistry, and materials engineering keeps yielding patents and new products. Emerging research seeks to lower environmental impact by designing biodegradable versions, or to improve occupational safety by capping or masking hazardous amine groups. The field rewards creative chemists who understand both commerce and science, as advances often hinge on translating bench-top phenomena to the messy reality of plant-scale equipment and dirty real-world surfaces.
Detailed toxicology studies on DETA silane and related organoaminosilanes examine both acute and chronic exposure. Animal studies flag skin and eye irritation, plus respiratory distress at higher air concentrations. Long-term studies so far have not found clear links with severe disease, but prudent risk management always means minimizing unnecessary contact—especially since high-level amine exposure can trigger sensitization or asthma. Environmental studies note rapid hydrolysis in water, reducing persistence in natural ecosystems. Regulatory reviews by US EPA, ECHA, and Asian agencies check new data every few years, ensuring continued debate about allowable exposure and disposal methods. I’ve seen worker health programs that monitor conditions using personal exposure badges and medical surveillance: these reduce litigation risk and keep staff more productive over decades of use.
Innovation cycles in advanced materials almost always return to the question: can we stick these two things together better, for longer? DETA silane, with its flexible backbone and reactive amines, satisfies current engineering needs but still leaves room for improvement. Teams around the world chase lower VOC emission systems, seeking moisture-cure adhesives or self-healing networks that outperform legacy products. Green chemistry efforts strive for less hazardous syntheses and easier end-of-life disposal. As additive manufacturing and 3D printing explode, materials demand tailored coupling agents to manage new interfaces between metals, glass, and ever-more-complex polymers. The next wave may see silane blocks built into the backbone of recyclable thermoplastics or used to anchor smart coatings able to switch function in response to sensors. For both researchers and industrial users, learning from both successes and failures ensures that bridging the gap between science and product remains a hands-on, evolving endeavor.
Take a stroll through any manufacturing plant dealing with advanced materials and you catch a glimpse of the vast network of molecules that make our modern life tick. Among them, long names like 3-[2-(2-Aminoethylamino)Ethylamino]Propyl-Trimethoxysilane might sound intimidating, though they're crucial in ways often ignored. This silicon-based compound doesn’t end up front and center on consumer shelves, but its action behind the scenes makes a big impact, especially in the world of materials science and industrial chemistry.
All those high-strength wind turbine blades, resilient automotive parts, or cutting-edge electronics rely on strong adhesion between very different materials. This is never just a matter of “glue”—anyone who’s tried to stick something to glass or metal knows regular adhesives simply fail. Here’s where the compound plays its leading role: it acts as a silane coupling agent, basically serving as a direct line for communication between two unlike materials. The “trimethoxysilane” side grabs the surface of inorganic substrates like glass, silica, metals, or even minerals. On the other end, the “amino” groups grab onto organic polymers—the stuff found in many plastics, resins, and rubbers.
Without a solid interface, adhesives peel away and composites fall apart under stress. Products come with shorter lifespans. Factories face angry recalls. This compound wasn’t just invented to fill a space on a lab shelf: its use answers real-world needs, from lightweight car parts that hold together under heat, to insulation in skyscrapers that stands up to years of weathering. A single silane-treated fiber, for example, can help composites resist water absorption, which means durability in places from underground pipes to high-rise buildings.
Back in the early days working in a lab, I watched the transformation firsthand. A glass slide, untreated, bared its slick, smooth surface—epoxy adhesives just beaded up. But after a quick dip in a dilute bath of this silane, that same slide gripped the adhesive like never before. Studies have confirmed these results well beyond my limited corner of the world. In research cited by ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, silane treatment improved the tensile strength of fiber-reinforced plastics by as much as 30%. Reports from the electronics industry have shown fewer failures through improved epoxy encapsulation after introducing silane coupling agents.
Of course, wide adoption brings questions. The drive for “greener” chemicals makes us look closer at environmental impact. Manufacturers have moved toward water-based application methods and stricter workplace exposure controls, sharply reducing release of volatile organic compounds. But no one holds a silver bullet for challenges like safe disposal and potential toxicity. Here, the solution isn’t about tossing out the old, but improving process efficiency—cutting waste, recycling rinses, and developing next-generation silanes that do more with less toxicity.
In the end, 3-[2-(2-Aminoethylamino)Ethylamino]Propyl-Trimethoxysilane stays mostly unseen but unfailingly important. It stands at that intersection of chemistry and daily utility—where big advances don’t always mean something you can hold in your hand, but something you sure notice when it’s missing. That matters in a world built on reliability and innovation.
Every bottle, drum, or bag in a lab or on a jobsite carries information about what’s inside. The label isn’t just a sticker—it gives a hint about what kind of personal protective equipment feels appropriate, what exposure limits to respect, and the specific hazards. Years back, I’ve watched a new lab tech open an unfamiliar bottle. He took a second and read through the label and Safety Data Sheet. In that moment, he learned that this chemical gives off fumes that can hurt your lungs, and gloves alone won’t cut it. With that little bit of care, he dodged a serious problem.
Splash-proof goggles, chemical-resistant gloves, a long-sleeved lab coat, sturdy shoes—protective gear separates a routine day from an emergency room visit. I always notice folks who think, “I’ll only pour one beaker,” then pour something corrosive and pay the price. For some compounds, even gloves or a coat don’t feel like enough. Inhaling some dust or vapors can harm you quicker than you’d expect. Respirators, fume hoods, or a well-ventilated workspace reduce that chance fast. The key isn’t about fear, just respect for what those chemicals can do.
Spills and scattered containers set the stage for disaster. I’ve seen labs with three different acids stored together, and powders left open near coffee mugs. That sort of carelessness can lead to fires or bad chemical reactions. Solid safety means keeping containers closed, labeling everything, and wiping surfaces down after every use. Storing each substance in the correct cabinet matters too—acids don’t mix safely with bases or organic solvents.
Even a stable-looking compound can become dangerous under certain conditions. Some break down if exposed to heat or sunlight. Others release toxic gases when mixed with water. I developed a habit to double-check locks on storage cabinets, verify temperature controls, and look for signs of leaks. Keeping everything in the right place—flammables away from ignition sources, acids separated from metals or bases—keeps surprises out of the equation.
Glancing over emergency procedures before starting work never hurt anyone. Eyewash stations and showers need easy access. Fire extinguishers should always be charged and within reach, and spill kits need restocking after every use. In one plant I worked, someone tried to rinse a chemical burn without knowing where the eyewash was. Those seconds cost him. A little preparation goes a long way—a drill, a walk-through, even a chat with coworkers can keep people calm and safe in a crisis.
Anyone dealing with chemicals deserves training, no matter how routine the job feels. New hires need to hear stories, see demonstrations, and ask questions until the steps feel second nature. More experienced workers still benefit from refreshers. Guidelines change, new hazards get discovered, and it helps to challenge old shortcuts and bring everyone up to speed. People make mistakes, but training slashes the odds of that mistake turning into a headline.
Working with organosilanes, I’ve seen how a casual approach to storage can turn safe handling into a disaster. 3-[2-(2-Aminoethylamino)Ethylamino]Propyl-Trimethoxysilane isn’t a common household product. You don’t toss it on the shelf beside your coffee. It’s a specialty chemical with real risks. As someone who’s knocked over a half-closed reagent bottle in a dim corner of a storeroom, I feel strongly about sticking to wise storage. It makes the difference between safe progress and a dangerous setback.
Open a bottle of trimethoxysilane derivative on a humid day, and you might witness a reaction you never wanted. These compounds soak up water from the air like sponges. That triggers hydrolysis, kicking off a process that ruins the product’s performance and can clog lines or drums within a manufacturing setup. I’ve watched colleagues shrug off a slightly damp bottle, only to wonder why the next batch turned cloudy. Don’t give it that chance.
A dry, climate-controlled space goes beyond comfort. Desiccators or sealed cabinets work well, and I always check for silica gel packets or other drying agents nearby. It’s about more than following a chart or best practice—it’s learning from every costly error and planning one step ahead.
Trimethoxysilane-based materials form vapors that aren’t just irritating—they can be flammable. I think about the old storeroom where a colleague left a drum too close to a furnace outflow; the smell lingered for days. I recommend temperatures below 30°C, away from sunlight and heat sources. Storing containers on a lower shelf instead of right under the skylight can prevent a world of trouble.
Every label and tightly fastened cap in your storeroom wards off mistakes. The temptation to use masking tape and scrawled initials for a temporary fix dies hard, but outdated habits just invite error. Tightly sealed, corrosion-resistant containers hold up best, preferably original packaging. I double-check caps at the end of every shift, and I’ve taught even the busiest teammates to pause and look for leaks. Silane vapors aren’t fun to discover by accident.
Learned this one by sharing a bench with organics and acids: chemical vapors mix in unpredictable ways. Store 3-[2-(2-Aminoethylamino)Ethylamino]Propyl-Trimethoxysilane by itself, far from acids, oxidizers, and any water-based product. Good air movement is essential. Fume hoods work, but for bulk storage, a vented storeroom keeps everyone safer.
Complacency brings the riskiest surprises. A weekly walk-through ensures no leaks, corrosion, or bloated bottles. If you spot sweating on containers or a suspicious smell, don’t shrug it off. Training every worker on what “normal” looks like turns them from bystanders into the front line of prevention.
Personal protective equipment isn’t for show. Nitrile gloves, eye protection, and splash-resistant aprons are must-haves. Spills should be contained with absorbent pads and cleaned right away. I keep material safety data sheets within arm’s reach.
Careful handling, dry storage, and disciplined labeling make this chemical as reliable as your habits. Most importantly, learn from old mistakes, keep your eyes open, and never shave time off a safety step. You’ll never regret taking extra care with silanes.
Browsing through product catalogs, you see claims of “99% pure” splashed everywhere. Purity—often called assay—gets tossed around so much it almost loses its meaning. The question pops up: what does that number really say? My own years working in labs and talking to manufacturers showed me the gap between what's promised and what actually matters on the ground.
For buyers, purity is a kind of shorthand. It tells you how much of the main ingredient you get, minus everything else. In pharmaceuticals, a 99.5% assay shows most of the item is the desired material. Contaminants, leftover solvents, or trace metals can fill up the rest. That little sliver becomes the difference between a life-saving drug and a failed batch. Getting this right runs deeper than passing a regulatory check. It’s about patient safety and brand reputation. The wrong impurity at the wrong time can cause catastrophic recalls. In other sectors, like food additives or specialty chemicals, slight shifts in purity can gum up production lines and dip product quality.
Lab technicians, chemists, and quality managers live and breathe these numbers. In pharmaceuticals, regulatory authorities like the FDA or EMA don’t just want a high number; they demand consistent documentation. Batch after batch, results should stand up to scrutiny, with valid methods like HPLC or titration to back them up. For fine chemicals used in electronics or coatings, purity may hover at 99.99%—so high, even the tools used to measure those last decimal points need regular calibration. Impurities, even at the tiniest levels, can spur defects in microchips or lead to early product breakdown.
Trust rarely springs from a simple percentage on a label. Buyers now ask suppliers for detailed certificates of analysis, third-party verification, and full disclosure of trace impurity profiles. I've seen contracts get held up over a missing impurity spec or a test method inconsistency. More transparency means fewer surprises mid-project. Technology helps here: modern analytical instruments can pull up impurity maps and detect deviations suffered during shipping or storage.
No one wants a mystery mix. Associations and regulatory agencies set ranges for purity. The typical figure floats between 98% and 99.9%, depending on use. High-end reagent grades for labs or electronics stretch even higher. For industrial use, a slightly lower figure sometimes suffices, but even then, customers expect full clarity on what’s inside. Discussing these standards, I’ve noticed how much relies on repeatable processes—from batch records right through to raw material sourcing.
Solutions come from both sides: manufacturers push for cleaner processes, smarter filtration, and tighter quality controls. Customers demand precise documentation and sometimes conduct their own verification. Third-party labs now play a growing role, stepping in to confirm or challenge supplier claims. No system is perfect, but more eyes on every batch means higher odds of catching mistakes early.
Numbers on an assay report give buyers a starting point, not the full story. Checking how those numbers are reached and shared counts for just as much. Real-world trust in a supplier comes from matching high purity with openness, consistency, and the readiness to tackle an issue head-on if something goes wrong.
Sometimes the real impact of a product depends on how it mixes with something as simple as water. Take paints, glues, or even additives for agriculture — when folks use them, the expectation is straightforward: add to water, stir, and get to work. Yet, companies keep getting questions from customers about whether the latest product actually works in water-based systems. That’s not a small issue. Performance, safety, and cost all ride on the answer.
When someone asks if a chemical or material is ready for water systems, it’s not about picking answers from a chart. Chemistry steps in fast. Some materials mix right in, forming clear solutions. Others stubbornly sit on top, form clumps, or break down. Think about taking powder supplements and mixing them into a bottle. Some disappear with a few shakes. Some make you wish you skipped your vitamins altogether.
Nobody wants a product that clogs equipment or leaves residue. Years back, as a student working in a plant nursery, I saw frustrated growers dumping out clumpy tanks, losing money and time. Simple solubility tests could have prevented those messes and awkward calls to the supplier.
Manufacturers carry the big responsibility here. Reliable information matters. Too often, labels offer technical jargon with little context. Yet, clear guidelines benefit everyone. Publishing results from compatibility tests can give buyers real value. Water-based paints and cleaning agents with true compatibility require fewer hazardous solvents and often carry a lower environmental footprint. That matters for families, small businesses, and big corporations stuck following new environmental rules.
The wrong technical answer can mean lost efficiency, product recalls, and regulatory headaches. Recently, popular home sealants got pulled from shelves after buyers reported toxic fumes in “safe for water” products. Investigators found gaps between manufacturer claims and actual lab results. This kind of issue breeds mistrust.
So, what helps? Companies that test under real-world conditions and publish clear details win long-term loyalty. It’s not enough to check the box with a single test tube. Day-to-day life doesn’t happen in a controlled lab. Double-checking with hard water, or under temperature swings, often shows how materials or additives really behave. The farming world knows this all too well — water quality varies from well to well. Good products withstand those changes.
It helps when manufacturers partner with third parties or university labs. Independent results, especially in plain language, help cut through marketing noise. Customers don’t want surprises, they want straightforward results.
As more regulations push for sustainable, water-friendly options, this question—"Is this compatible with water-based systems?"—won’t vanish. Being clear, honest, and thorough isn’t just best practice, it builds trust with buyers. That trust grows loyalty and keeps doors open for new ideas, safer homes, and cleaner manufacturing. Experience and facts on the ground shape better solutions every day.
![3-[2-(2-Aminoethylamino)Ethylamino]Propyl-Trimethoxysilane](/static/26ffdaf2-b05a-4718-b9a8-e71fecc06434/images/2d/3-2-2-aminoethylamino-ethylamino-propyl-trimethoxysilane.png)
![3-[2-(2-Aminoethylamino)Ethylamino]Propyl-Trimethoxysilane](/static/26ffdaf2-b05a-4718-b9a8-e71fecc06434/images/3d/3-2-2-aminoethylamino-ethylamino-propyl-trimethoxysilane.gif)
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 3-[2-(2-Aminoethylamino)ethylamino]propyl(trimethoxy)silane |
| Other names |
N-(3-Trimethoxysilylpropyl)diethylenetriamine Trimethoxy[3-(2-aminoethylamino)propyl]silane 3-(2-Aminoethylamino)propyltrimethoxysilane Diethylenetriaminopropyltrimethoxysilane Aminopropyl diethylenetriamine trimethoxysilane DETA silane |
| Pronunciation | /θri-tuː-tuː-əˈmiːnoʊˌɛθ.ɪl.əˈmiːnoʊˌɛθ.ɪl.əˈmiːnoʊˌproʊpəl-traɪˌmɛθ.ɒk.siˌsaɪleɪn/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 1760-24-3 |
| Beilstein Reference | 3414201 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:60913 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL2107797 |
| ChemSpider | 162114 |
| DrugBank | DB07073 |
| ECHA InfoCard | echa-info-card:100.001.097 |
| EC Number | 01-2119970215-39-0002 |
| Gmelin Reference | 1462164 |
| KEGG | C18503 |
| MeSH | D017209 |
| PubChem CID | 71307860 |
| RTECS number | UU5957000 |
| UNII | 9RH7N2T27N |
| UN number | UN3334 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID4020944 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C10H27N3O3Si |
| Molar mass | 294.46 g/mol |
| Appearance | Colorless to yellow liquid |
| Odor | Amine-like |
| Density | 1.02 g/mL at 25 °C (lit.) |
| Solubility in water | soluble |
| log P | -2.2 |
| Vapor pressure | 1 mmHg (177°C) |
| Acidity (pKa) | 10.05 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 6.3 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -70.2·10⁻⁶ cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.462 |
| Viscosity | 7 mPa.s (25 °C) |
| Dipole moment | 2.68 D |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | Causes severe skin burns and eye damage. Causes serious eye damage. Harmful if swallowed. Harmful if inhaled. |
| GHS labelling | GHS05, GHS07 |
| Pictograms | GHS05,GHS07 |
| Signal word | Danger |
| Hazard statements | H315, H319, H302 |
| Precautionary statements | P261, P264, P271, P273, P280, P302+P352, P305+P351+P338, P304+P340, P312, P337+P313, P362+P364 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-1-0 |
| Flash point | > 110 °C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 Oral Rat > 2000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose) Oral Rat 2295 mg/kg |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | REL (Recommended): 5 mg/m³ |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not established |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
N-[2-(Aminoethylamino)ethyl]-3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane 3-Aminopropyltrimethoxysilane N-(2-Aminoethyl)-3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane Bis[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]amine 3-(2-Aminoethylamino)propyltrimethoxysilane |
